Are nuclear families always best for children?
I fancy myself as a bit of a people-watcher. I also like to think. Granted I have a horrible memory and carry a notebook everywhere to write things down so I don't forget them but that is off my topic.
I have been wondering lately if there is truth to the belief that nuclear families are better than other types of families.
Based on recent observations, I don't think so. (I know this is an unpopular belief and so I will cite examples.)
Our family is perfect in every way I fantasized a family could be. A mom, a dad, 3 kids, 2 cats. For us, it works.
But what if one parent is physically or verbally abusive? Is it better for the children to have dad at home if he is abusive?
What about a parent with a chemical dependency? This one strikes a little close to home for me.
I can honestly say with full conviction that it is better to raise children in a single parent home than to put them in an environment with someone abusing chemicals. (I lump alcohol, narcotics, and prescription drugs in this category.) Having lived through seeing several addicted family members and what it can do to a family, I would NEVER want another child to witness it. It retrospect, I find it amazing that there are so many things that happen in a household that one or both parents never know about. (Even when it includes the other parent.)
Raising our children is the *MOST* important thing we will do in our lives. Sometimes one parent is not up to the task. Sometimes one parent becomes detrimental to the development of your children.
Sometimes it is better to cut your losses and move on.
I have been wondering lately if there is truth to the belief that nuclear families are better than other types of families.
Based on recent observations, I don't think so. (I know this is an unpopular belief and so I will cite examples.)
Our family is perfect in every way I fantasized a family could be. A mom, a dad, 3 kids, 2 cats. For us, it works.
But what if one parent is physically or verbally abusive? Is it better for the children to have dad at home if he is abusive?
What about a parent with a chemical dependency? This one strikes a little close to home for me.
I can honestly say with full conviction that it is better to raise children in a single parent home than to put them in an environment with someone abusing chemicals. (I lump alcohol, narcotics, and prescription drugs in this category.) Having lived through seeing several addicted family members and what it can do to a family, I would NEVER want another child to witness it. It retrospect, I find it amazing that there are so many things that happen in a household that one or both parents never know about. (Even when it includes the other parent.)
Raising our children is the *MOST* important thing we will do in our lives. Sometimes one parent is not up to the task. Sometimes one parent becomes detrimental to the development of your children.
Sometimes it is better to cut your losses and move on.
